Happy Birthday to Who!!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY DOCTOR WHO!!
Sadly the day is marred by some sad news - Dr Who producer Verity Lambert has just passed away - yesterday to be precise. At the risk of sounding a bit sick (and honestly, I'm not trying to be) this news is also kind of fitting, as she was the very first person to produce Dr Who when it debuted in 1963. How odd that the lady who helped get such an iconic, ground-breaking, classic programme off the ground should leave us so close to its anniversary. RIP Verity, we'll never forget you.
And...what about "Time Crash"? Yep all those Peter Davison rumours came true and he did indeed return as the Fifth Dr albeit in a brief but enjoyable episode, penned by Steven Moffat, showing as part of the Beeb's "Children in Need" night last Friday. And guess what...this Old Cheeser actually MISSED the broadcast as he was out shopping for lights with his hubbie in Homebase! Shameful. Still that's what happens when you buy a flat and you STILL have to get things to furnish it. Anyway thanks to the likes of fellow bloggers like TimeWarden and Paul I was able to catch up on it via the net later anyway. Thank the (Time) Lord for that! And in case YOU missed it (does this mean you have a life too?) here it is:
And the verdict? As I said it was enjoyable but the overall shortness of the piece was a shame - 7-8 minutes is very brief for sufficient exposition and a “story” - and that doesn’t count the Martha/Titanic bits that topped and tailed it (quite cleverly edited in though I felt). We Who fans do seem to get short shrift sometimes - particularly seeing as it’s the 44th anniversary - it doesn’t seem that the Beeb have planned anything else. Anyway it was a nice enough “tribute” and I agree with what the others say about the affectionate quality of the piece - just not massively substantial.
As for Peter D, good to see him back although dare I say he seemed very pompous and shrill, rather more overwrought than his original Fifth Dr persona! Then again, David T was back to his flippant, hyper-active self and one could kind of sympathise with the Fifth Doc’s annoyance with him! Should have kicked him out of the TARDIS doors and taken over the reins again, heh heh...
6 Comments:
At 4:13 am , TimeWarden said...
It's really sad about Verity. Her contribution is considerable, far greater than people give her credit for, and without her and Hartnell the series wouldn't be here today. She said it was wrong to reveal the Doctor's origins at the end of Troughton's era... and she was right. She said it was wrong to make Pertwee an establishment figure... and she was right again.
Her creativity gave us the TARDIS, the console room, the Daleks. She never resorted to the cheap trickery of regeneration... but relied on good stories well told. RIP Verity, the best, as well as my favourite, Producer of "Doctor Who". She would've been 72 on the 27th.
At 7:58 am , Steve said...
I must admit it was interesting to see Peter Davison's doctor so blatantly contrasted with Tennant's - as much as I like Tennant it did rather semaphore how annoying his idiosyncrasies are!
Sad news about Verity.
At 8:42 am , The Sagittarian said...
Thanks, mate. Now that I have told my 10 year old she is demanding a Dalek Cake! No problem - here's one I whipped up earlier. I have actually bought her an Encyclopaedia of Dr Who for Xmas (yes, yes she really wants a remote controlled Dalek and a sonic screwdriver - don't we all!). Am off back to the Market tomorrow for those Dr Who mags....
At 3:36 pm , Deemer said...
Interesting clip. I think I could get into this.
At 1:44 pm , Old Cheeser said...
Tim - Interesting views that Verity held there, I think. Imagine if the show had gone with her suggestions after all. If they HADN'T recast the part of the Dr after William Hartnell left (after only 3 years!) surely this would have meant the programme would have finished permanently! Gimmick or not, at least the concept of regeneration allowed for continuity. What do you think about that?
Steve - Yes. 2 years in I STILL do find DT annoying in his portrayal of the Doc at times.
Sagi - Ha ha, well all I can say is your 10 year old has exquisite good taste being a DW fan, but not so good for you perhaps having to make a cake! I'm sure the Encylopedia is going to give her an, erm...encyclopediac knowledge of the programme and hoorah for that! And glad to hear you are going back to get the mags. A collector's item I'm sure.
Deemer - Yes, give it a whirl! Perhaps treat yourself to one of the recent DVDS, the Season One opener "Rose" would be a good introduction. You can but try...
At 4:38 pm , TimeWarden said...
Verity wasn't against recasting the lead but thought revealing the Doctor's origins spoilt the mystery of the very question posed by the title "Doctor Who(?)".
Regarding regeneration, I think in RTD's version it has become a gimmick like the sonic screwdriver and should be used more sparingly than it has been. Doctor number Nine regenerated too soon as did the Master.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home